Last week the Government announced some garbled populist spin about giving football ‘back to the fans’, hot off the back of Becks sporting a gold and green scarf and aimed at getting ‘blokes’ to vote no doubt.
But here in Gloucestershire the three main players in the battle for the parliamentary seat are playing a different tactic with the beautiful game. Gloucester City Football Club and it’s future has been placed as a top priority for each candidate – but is any of the election spiel actually going to make a difference in a city where egg-chasing remains the populist sport.
[For those who need a recap Gloucester used to play at Meadow Park, on the banks of the River Severn, until July 2007 when ‘the rains came’ and flooded the ground for the third time in a decade. Already uninsurable after previous floods, the stadium was ruined and the Tigers were exiled first to the New Lawn (Nailsworth), then to the Corinium Stadium (Cirencester) and now, controversially) next season to the other end of the Golden Valley to Whaddon Road (Cheltenham)]
Since 2007 there has been a lot of talk about the return to the City and precious little action from the powers that be. This time last year I was invited to take a tour of Meadow Park with MP (now prospective parliamentary candidate) Parmjit Dhanda (Lab) and Hillary Benn. It was a sight which made me feel slightly overwhelmed. Where the pitch once was were mounds of smelly dirt (the ground is next door to the tip so the topsoil is contaminated too) covered in weeds. The publicity shy owner Eamonn quietely explained to Mr Benn that Gloucester would return to the city and they would become a league side in a decade -and I believe him, but they are going to have to do it the hard way.
After the tour the politicians, some friendly chaps from the Environment Agency and club officials sat down to talk about the ambitious plans which will (hopefully) see a new stadium built on the Meadow Park site, encorporating flood defences to protect the club and neighbouring homes.
The visit, arranged by Parmjit, followed several parliamentary debates and early day motions – aimed at raising awareness of the Tigers plight by the politician who was pictured on the pitch, clad in a City shirt at the historic play off final win at Farnborough. Throughout his term he has used his political nous to keep City in people’s thoughts – not easy when the local paper could not care less and fans are dropping off, faced with a 40 mile round trip for ‘home’ matches and 100 miles and more for away.
When Gloucester were dumped in the Blue Square North he wrote to Lord Triesman, pointing out the farce of Gloucester now becoming north when Worcester remained south. In 2008 he debated the future of the club in parliament. Bringing football banter to the Houses of Parliament can backfire and make most politicians sound like twats but Parmjit managed to sound passionate and articulate – because he is and he does care.
But the first shot of this election was fired about a fortnight ago in the council chamber at Gloucester City Council. There PPC Jeremy Hilton (Lib Dem) led a motion to award £20K to the Tigers to facilitate the groundshare with Cheltenham Town (Ciren’s ground doesn’t meet the ground grading by about 30 seats or something). Knowing it was the last meeting before the local and general elections Mr Hilton (who is also standing in the local elections and sits on the county council too for good measure), resplendent in a City tie, was in fine fettle:
Tigers are an endangered species all over the globe. We need to make sure our own Tigers do not become an endangered species in Gloucester.
His motion was seconded and supported by almost the whole council, with each political leader reeling off the same line about how important football is to civic pride and how the football club really is as important as the rugby club – one councillor even boasting how a lad he coached as a youngster is now the top goalscorer.
Hilton, who has quietly endured the brutal wind at the Corinium Stadium throughout the season, is going all out on his support for the Tigers. The return to Gloucester is his fourth point on his manifesto and he has sat as the chair on the ‘football task committee’ (the loosely titled group aimed at helping the club build a future back home) for several years. He might look like an idiot in his City cap but his presence at matches since September has been a slow burner, imprinting himself in the fans’ consciousness.
By contrast Parmjit, perhaps with the pressures of Westminster and a young family, seems to have gone a little quieter on the football front. There is no doubt he has gone out of his way to keep the wider public aware of the Tigers plight in the past three years – during the promotion campaign last year he wore his City tie constantly, for weeks on end. He loves football (Liverpool being his main love, after City) and often sends texts to keep abreast of the City gossip. But he faces a tough battle with the obnoxious third candidate – Richard Graham (Con) and this threatens to overshadow his campaigning for the club.
Parmjit’s latest blog doesn’t mention football – but be sure as hell it will come up at hustings. I fully expect to see him at the match on Saturday and to see the picture of him at Farnborough on his election material.
Which leaves Mr Graham, a former banker who is a big hunting fan, apparently, bang on for his target audience in Gloucester. His website mentions bringing City back to Meadow Park but I have never seen him at a match. Jeremy and Parmjit could probably name a starting 11 between them with ease. He would not pick Tom Webb out of a line up, for all his claims of a love of Gloucester.
In a city where egg chasing takes most of the headlines it will be interesting to see the ‘minority sport’ thrown into the political arena in the coming weeks.